Writing for Slate’s Human Nature blog, William Saletan posits that “the late-breaking frontrunner for dumbest policy idea of 2008: defunding Planned Parenthood in the name of fighting abortion.”
The campaign to defund Planned Parenthood is really about abortions. [The Family Research Council] would like to see fewer of them. So would I. And that’s the crux of the idiocy: The single best thing you can spend money on to reduce the number of abortions, not just in this country but around the world, is Planned Parenthood.
I’ll say that again: If you define pro-life as preventing abortions, Planned Parenthood is the most effective pro-life organization in the history of the world. No, it doesn’t give teenagers the idea of having sex. That idea comes to them quite naturally, thank you very much. What Planned Parenthood does, more comprehensively than anyone else, is to distribute the means and knowledge to control your risk of getting pregnant when you don’t want to be pregnant. And those two things, combined with pressure to exercise that control assiduously, are the surest way to prevent abortions. If you wait till women are already unhappily pregnant, you’re too late.
In broadcasting the world’s first live 3-D football game to theaters in Los Angeles, New York and Boston on Thursday evening, the NFL promises an “up close, personal, visceral” experience that could open a new revenue stream for the league.
The original members of Straight No Chaser perform their “Teen Sensation Medley”, poking fun at Backstreet Boys, N*Sync, and even Britney Spears, complete with cheesy choreography.
The views expressed on this blog solely represent those of the author and are not intended to represent the views of any other individual or institution, including (but not limited to) the author's employer and/or place of business as well as any other organization of which the author may be associated. No third-party entity — person, business, company, organization, institution or otherwise — sponsors or endorses the content of this blog.
This site may contain copyrighted material. The fair use of a copyrighted work, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. This constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C., § 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed for nonprofit educational and/or purposes. If you are the copyright owner and you disagree with this site’s use of your copyrighted material, the blog publisher will immediately comply with any request by the copyright owner to remove or modify the material in question.
For this site's complete disclaimer and terms of use, click here.
*
*