RSS Feed for FYIFYI

Change I can believe in

bkn_index
*

Charts like this one have become all too common in the news of late — making investors panic, pension-holders fret and politicians do very little to effect meaningful solutions to the varying crises reflected in these charts.

But the chart above is not an index of the Dow Jones or an index of consumer confidence or an index of Congress’ approval ratings. Rather, this particular chart has me encouraged. In fact, it’s got me jumping for joy! It’s the index of my weight loss since the beginning of the year. And what it shows is that, as of today, I’ve lost 34 pounds in 66 days! With less than a quarter of the year gone by, I’m already nearly a third of the way toward my goal of losing 106 pounds by year’s end!

I have to admit that I’m pretty proud of myself — not only because of how much weight I’ve lost, but also for sticking with it for this long and for my commitment to continue on to my goal. This is certainly change I can believe in! Continued

Absence does not always make the heart grow fonder

Taking a break from something can often give you some perspective that you may not get in the day-to-day grind. This 28-day (more or less) hiatus from blogging was good for me. It gave me some extra time to concentrate on some other things and it allowed me to step back from the blogosphere and view it from a casual observer perspective instead of an active participant. And it was eye-opening.

Since the latter part of last year, my blogging has been disproportionately focused on politics. The political commentary often evolved (or devolved, depending upon your perspective) into a response/counterresponse interaction with other bloggers and commenters — some of which escalated into ever-increasing caustic comments that became more personal and less substantive. I confess that I haven’t always lived up to my own standard of civility, respect and reason. And when I find myself wallowing hip-deep in the same mud as the other mudslingers, it’s time to reevaluate. And that’s what I did during my break.

When you step away from it, it’s amazing how juvenile it has become. The level of animus and disrespect among the dueling blogs is really amazing — and, quite frankly disheartening. It’s a microcosm of the larger “war” in this country between the firmly entrenched ideologues, who by their actions demonstrate that partisan loyalty comes first before the country’s bests interests. It’s not confined to the right wing and the GOP; the Democratic soldiers and left wing are just as unyielding. And as each side pulls the nation toward its position, the country is ever-so-certainly being torn asunder. And that, more than any other foreign threat, is the biggest danger we face as Americans.

We are facing the worst crises in nearly a century. Yet, partisans are more focused on winning the ideological fight than they are with saving our nation from economic devastation that few in this country are equipped to handle. The Republicans have disgusted me in ever-increasing ways with their grandstanding obstructionism; at the same time, Democrats have further convinced me why I will never join their ranks with their politically motivated power grabs and undemocratic governance of Congress. It’s all enough to make me want to throw up and simply give up.

It doesn’t seem to matter any more. Nothing that we say really makes a difference in Washington. Republican and Democratic politicians share at least one common purpose — to maintain and expand their grip on power and to pander to those who fill their campaign and personal coffers. Corruption is not the sickness of any one party. They are all mired in varying levels of corruption with very few exceptions. Money talks; constituent needs take a hike.

Meanwhile, the loyal minions of each wing war with each other in the blogosphere, discussion boards and chat rooms — unaware that Washington doesn’t care. Little that is said in the blogosphere changes anyone’s mind. Very few actually listen with an open mind. Fewer still take the time to truly educate themselves on the very issues they so passionately argue about. Misinformation, distortions and misrepresentations abound, which muddies everything to the point that it’s difficult to debate the merits of issues when the facts of those issues are so much in dispute. So often, it’s like arguing with a wall — pointless, fruitless and maddening.

To be honest, my break from the tit-for-tat spats in the blogosphere was refreshing. The absence did not make my heart grow fonder. Which is why I’m, once again, changing how I blog.

I’ll still opine about current affairs and politics, but certainly not nearly as often. In fact, my blogging over all will be much less prolific than previously. Instead, I’m going to go back to doing more non-political blogging. Yes, I’m indeed changing course once again. But as yesterday’s quotation by Heraclitus said, “Nothing endures but change.”

Stay tuned.

I’ve moved

Due to some persisting server and database issues, I’ve moved this blog to a new server. At the same time, the blog was moved to the root domain of bradneese.com (rather than the bkneese.com domain it has been residing within). Consequently, for those readers who follow me through RSS feeds, the blog’s feed address has changed as well to http://bradneese.com/feed/. (This also means that the blog updates will no longer be picked up by BNN.)

I had planned on resuming blogging on March 1 after my month-long hiatus in February, but the server and database issues have delayed that start somewhat. Even so, my schedule is still so busy that I’m not sure how much blogging I’ll be able to do this week.

So that’s the quick update.

You won’t be seeing as much of me

January was a big month for me both personally and professionally. And the result will be that you won’t be seeing as much of me for a while — and in some ways, hopefully it will be permanent.

First, you won’t be seeing as much of me because I’m on a weight loss plan to drop 100 pounds by the end of this year. I started the day after New Year’s Day. And the first month was a big success. I’ve lost more than 20 pounds! The best part is that it’s not from any radical or fad diet. It’s from a sensible, balanced and healthy change in eating habits that can be sustained long-term, reducing my daily calorie intake to a level appropriate for my current weight and age for healthy, managed weight loss. A couple of weeks ago, I started my exercise regimine, which again is nothing radical or extreme, but something that’s achievable, sustainable and enjoyable enough that I won’t give it up as easily as other exercise programs I’ve tried. For the first time in nearly 20 years, I’ve found a weight loss plan that I can stick to and found a willpower to keep going forward to my next goal and to my ultimate goal this year. With less than 10% of the year gone by, I’m already 20% toward my goal. (You can track my progress here.) By this time next year, I’m hoping that everyone will be seeing a lot less of me.

Second, my professional life continues to grow. My responsibilities at work continue to expand and the time commitment continues to increase. Consequently, I have less spare time to devote to other outside projects, including this blog. Success in one area often means that other things in our life may have to make sacrifices. Since my family comes first and they would be the last area to sacrifice, the only areas left are my hobbies, one of which would be this — blogging. I enjoy it (most days), but it can consume a lot of my time. And it’s the easiest for me to adjust (even if it is a bit of an addiction). So, those who follow me here on this blog will be seeing less of me — a lot less of me over the next few weeks.

I’ve decided to take the month of February off from blogging. It will help me take the time to reprioritize my life and also help me concentrate on one of my primary goals this year — to lose weight and get fit. It will also allow me to get back to one of my other goals this year, which is to become increasingly proficient in a second language. Both of those goals take a significant investment of time, leaving less time for other things outside of work and family.

After February, I’ll resume blogging in some form. I don’t know what that will look like as far as content and frequency. Hopefully I’ll come back more focused, rejuvenated and many more pounds lighter!

New year, new name… same big mouth

With the new year comes the successful completion of my first resolution, which was to change the name of this blog.

Over the last few months, as I discussed previously, this blog has evolved into more of a commentary site with significant discussion about politics and social issues rather than the light-hearted, observational type blog that I originally envisioned. Since this evolution of the blog no longer represented the spirit of the original concept, I decided that I needed to change the name, even if only slightly.

“Brad Neese: Living Large in Oklahoma” just doesn’t seem to capture the true personality of this specific blog any longer. I’d rather save it for later in case I decide that I want to once again do a light-hearted, more personally focused blog in addition to this commentary blog. The reality is that this blog and its focus will be the one that I will feel most dedicated to. Here’s what I said back in November

Some friends and long-time readers of this blog and the previous incarnations of my blogging expressed disappointment that I was giving up the political and current affairs writing. It seems, according to them, that I do my best blogging and writing when I talk about those things that stir up my passions. Politics, government and current affairs, social justice, faith matters and specific circumstances that affect me or my family are what stir up my passions the most.

So, I went back to writing specifically about those things that are on my mind and stirring my passions on any given day. Much of the time that means it will be about my viewpoint or others’ viewpoints that I find interesting and what to share regarding current affairs and politics.

So, here it is. The new name of the blog, as you can see at the top, is “Brad Neese At Large.”

at large (idiom) —

a. free from restraint or confinement; at liberty.

b. to a considerable extent; at length: to treat a subject at large.

c. as a whole; in general: the country at large.

d. representing the whole of a state, district, or body rather than one division or part of it: a delegate at large.

The fine print

For various legal reasons, I have added some necessary “fine print” for this site, which includes a general disclaimer as well as a “Terms of Use” agreement. You can find the general disclaimer on the side bar of each page. You can also find it on the “DISCLAIMER/TERMS OF USE” page, which also includes (obviously) the more complete Terms of Use. For your convenience and in the interest of full disclosure, I’ve included it all below Continued

Spending time with family for the holidays

As our extended family gathers together today for a Christmas holiday reunion, I will be taking a brief break from blogging to devote my time to precious fellowship with those who are most dear to me. The time we get to share together has diminished over the years as we’ve gotten older and our lives more hectic, so every moment that we do get to spend together is a treasured moment.

The blog won’t be entirely dormant. I’ve pre-scheduled my specially selected Christmas songs for each morning from now through Christmas Day.

I will be back after Christmas. Until then, to all my friends and to all my “foes,” I wish you a very merry Christmas, filled with abundant blessings, treasured moments,peace, joy and love.

Happy birthday, dear Jesus!

“Glory to God in the highest,
and on earth peace to men on whom his favor rests.”

Hold onto your hats

If you think we’ve had a few deep and provocative discussions in the last few days, I’m about to delve into an even touchier topic after reading a couple of interesting blog posts this morning. If you’re squeamish about political hot potatoes, you might wait until tomorrow morning to check back in.

If you’re ready to tackle a sensitive subject, stay tuned for a couple of provocative posts this afternoon.

Things you should never put in an e-mail

Ron Sylvester, who blogs at What the Judge Ate for Breakfast, looks at “the kinds of emails that get you in trouble.”

My wife says you should never put anything in a company e-mail that you don’t want to be shown to 12 strangers on a big movie screen. She practices employment law, including sexual harassment lawsuits, and she said you wouldn’t believe what people put in e-mails that end up being shown to juries in public courtrooms.

… Searching electronic archives of company e-mails and files is becoming an increasingly useful tool for lawyers involved in lawsuits against you or your boss. It’s called “e-discovery.”

Sylvester references Roger Matus‘ list of phrases that lawyers and investigators search for.

  1. “I could get into trouble for telling you this, but…”
  2. “Delete this email immediately.”
  3. “I really shouldn’t put this in writing.”
  4. “Don’t tell So-and-So.” Or, “Don’t send this to So-and-So.”
  5. “She/He/They will never find out.”
  6. “We’re going to do this differently than normal.”
  7. “I don’t think I am supposed to know this, but…”
  8. “I don’t want to discuss this in e-mail. Please give me a call.”
  9. “Don’t ask. You don’t want to know.”
  10. “Is this actually legal?”

Who’s misinformed?

Think Progress highlights another Sean Hannity distortion:

[Tuesday night], Fox’s Hannity & Colmes hosted John Ziegler, author of a push poll attempting to prove that voters who supported Barack Obama were misinformed. Hannity used Ziegler’s study to complain that Obama supporters didn’t know about “really significant issues” like Bill Ayers and Obama’s views on coal. He insisted that only those who watched Fox News understood the real issues:

HANNITY: If you don’t listen to talk radio, if you don’t watch the FOX News Channel, you’re not anywhere nearly as informed as people that are just hearing the bumper stickers, the slogans, the snippets of the commercials of the media. So, journalism died in 2008, and it influenced a lot of people on the way out.

ZIEGLER: That’s exactly right.
*

You can watch the video clip here. Think Progress provides this fact-checking rebuttal…

Studies have consistently shown Fox viewers to be among the most misinformed Americans. A 2008 Pew study ranked Fox News dead last in the number of “high knowledge” viewers, with only 19 percent of Fox viewers able to correctly identify the majority party in Congress (Democrats), the name of the U.S. Secretary of State (Condoleezza Rice), and name of British Prime Minister (Gordon Brown).

Fox viewers are particularly misinformed about the Iraq war. A 2003 study found three common misperceptions about the war held by many Americans: first, that US troops found evidence of close pre-war links between Iraq and al-Qaeda; second, that troops found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; and third, that world public opinion favored Washington’s going to war with Iraq. Fox viewers were the most likely to believe these falsehoods:

Eighty percent of Fox viewers were found to hold at least one misperception, compared to 23 percent of NPR/PBS consumers. All the other media fell in between. … As to the number of misconceptions held by their audiences, Fox far outscored all of its rivals. A whopping 45 percent of its viewers believed all three misperceptions, while the other commercial networks scored between 12 percent and 16 percent. Only nine percent of [print media] readers believed all three, while only four percent of the NPR/PBS audience did.

*
Nate Silver has more about John Ziegler’s push poll as well as Ziegler’s response.