War Crimes — Will the U.S. hold itself to the same standard?
Posted by Brad at 4:42pm Monday, November 17, 2008
Scott Horton of Harper’s Magazine highlights a sobering analysis by a well-respected former war crimes tribunal judge and he discusses the ominous implications:
The most remarkable part of the report is certainly the forward written by Patricia Wald, one of the nation’s most respected retired federal appellate judges. Judge Wald has a credential that few of her colleagues share: she left the court of appeals to serve as a war crimes tribunal judge for Yugoslavia and she also served as a member of the Commission President Bush constituted to look at the false allegations of WMDs in Iraq. Judge Wald compared the current allegations surfacing about detainee abuse authorized by President Bush with the cases she examined coming out of the war in Yugoslavia—that resulted in the indictment and conviction of a number of political leaders in the Balkans. Here’s what she has to say:
There are bound to be casualties when any nation veers from its domestic and international obligations to uphold human rights and international humanitarian law. Those casualties are etched on the minds and bodies of many of the 62 former detainees interviewed for this report, many of whom suffered infinite variations on physical and mental abuse, including intimidation, stress positions, enforced nudity, sexual humiliation, and interference with religious practices.
Indeed, I was struck by the similarity between the abuse they suffered and the abuse we found inflicted upon Bosnian Muslim prisoners in Serbian camps when I sat as a judge on the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague, a U.N. court fully supported by the United States. The officials and guards in charge of those prison camps and the civilian leaders who sanctioned their establishment were prosecuted—often by former U.S. government and military lawyers serving with the tribunal—for war crimes, crimes against humanity and, in extreme cases, genocide.
There should be no confusion about what is being said here. One of America’s most prominent judges–and one of our few judicial experts on war crimes–is saying that the factual basis exists to charge officials of the Bush Administration. The test is fairly simple: is the United States now prepared to apply to itself the same legal standards that the United States applied to political leaders in the former Yugoslavia? It is in the end a simple question of justice. And a question of whether the United States is prepared itself to live by the standards it imposes on others.




On Nov 17, 2008, Jim Martin said:
War is not a “legal” thing. War comes to protect our wives and children as our fore fathers did. Warriors protect and pacifists protest while being protected by better men.
Don’t correct my sexism. Men have been the protectors for all of history…a few pinky waists will not change that.
Well managed web site Comrade. You have a nice smile and will be/are a great dad. Merry Christmas. Gosh I love Oklahoma…so many opinions! Caucasians really know how to steal prime real estate.
(spel cheked by google. grammar by choice..I be a hick from the Arbuckle sticks ya know)
On Nov 18, 2008, Brad said:
Thank you for the kind words in the last paragraph (right up to the point about Caucasians stealing prime real estate).
One question, though, regarding your comments in the first paragraph:
Are you opposed to war crimes tribunals like the Nuremberg Trials, the International War Tribunal of the former Yugoslovia or the war crimes trials in Iraq that tried and convicted Saddam Hussein and his henchmen?